In Shirley
Jackson's, "The Lottery," one theme is Man's ability (and need) to
rationalize generally unacceptable actions. The most common means
Jackson uses to illustrate this idea is through her employment of tradition in
the story. Perhaps the lottery in the village was necessitated
in the beginning for the sake of population control, or something along those lines;
however, as time passed each year the lottery continued, and each year more details
to its origins were lost. “Because so
much of the ritual had been forgotten or discarded…” Jackson wrote about the
ceremony, “…years and years ago…part[s] of the ritual had been allowed to lapse,”
yet, because it was tradition, the villagers persisted in their ways. Not even
the decrepit black box could be changed because even though there had been
discussion on building a new box, the villagers objected because, “…no one wanted
to upset even as much as tradition was represented by [it].” It quickly becomes
apparent that while the act of the lottery is wrong and frightening—there is
some evidence that the villagers fear it each year, talking in hushed tones and
hardly laughing at jokes—they continue regardless, because that’s what
tradition dictates. Those who object to the practice, like the north village
that has entirely stopped, are deemed crazy and too young and immature to
understand the importance of such ideas. People like Old Man Warner are
especially vulnerable to this response, having grown up with it for 77 years
and never once falling victim to it. Because the majority of the community is
not impacted by the single yearly death, they have no personal drive to stop
it. Probability states it won’t be them who are chosen. This changed when they
are the one being stoned as Tessie Hutchison illustrated. She was begging for a
second chance, after being so nonchalant about the tradition previously. Because
the community members don’t feel empathy, especially since they have been
participating in this act like it’s a normal exciting thing, since they were
children, they don’t see what’s so horrific about the event, and if they do,
they are too afraid of change to act on it.
Much
of the story reminded me of religious tradition. On a smaller level I was
reminded of Christmas and Easter. Neither holiday is based solely in
Christianity and both have morphed incredibly over the years to form something
entirely different than their origins, yet each year the majority of Americans
celebrate both—some in a very religious matter—with little regard to the way
they have been shaped. On a more intense note, it reminded me of the current
struggles of the LGBT community in religion. Many of the people of the older
crowd—the real Old Man Warens--are claiming gay practices and relations to be
wrong, while the younger crowd—like those in the story—see differently. As a
young person you are crazy if you buy into the idea of equal rights for the
LGBT community, even though those in the communities in many states could lose
their job, housing, education, etc. among other persecutions, merely for their
sexuality, much like in the story one person could die merely from the bad luck
of drawing the dot. This is justified through religious tradition preaching
that it’s okay to act like this way because of someone’s sexuality. In both real life and in “The Lottery”, tradition is used as a justification of harmful actions.
Both are strong comparisons. I would only extend upon the LGBT example by pointing out that those who discriminate generally will continue to do so until it touches them personally. For instance, those with a strong stance and sense of tradition about "Adam and Eve...not Adam and Steve" generally only snap out of tradition if Adam or Steve end up being a family member. Then, for some, it becomes easier to see that traditions can be outdated and in need of changing.
ReplyDelete